![]() ![]() Canonical employed developers to make the chosen default experience as pleasant as possible for users. So, what set Ubuntu apart from Debian? For starters, there was a clear product: the Ubuntu desktop. The goal was to create a version of Linux geared toward non-technical users. Unlike Debian, Ubuntu is the product of a private company. Debian is great for people who care more about the values of free software, want more control over how their PC works, are creating a server, or value long-term stability. In short, Debian isn't hard to use, but it is geared more toward technical users than Ubuntu or Linux Mint. If you want to use newer software on Debian, you can, but doing so comes with more bugs and instability. New versions of Debian only come around once every two to three years, and app updates are frozen in time alongside the rest of the system, aside from security patches and similar maintenance. If you're coming to Debian from a different version of Linux, you may notice that much of the software is older than what you get elsewhere. The reasons to use Debian are many, but only a few are likely to matter all that much to people first discovering free software. This isn't to suggest that there's nothing special about Debian. I won't go into details about them here, though, because as Debian-based distros, Ubuntu and Linux Mint inherent these same tools. Debian uses the DEB format and the APT package manager. ![]() Yet there is a major part of the experience that is specific to Debian. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |